ADOBE CAPTIVATE VS ARTICULATE 360 MP4
ADOBE CAPTIVATE VS ARTICULATE 360 SOFTWARE

Multiple projects can be open at the same time. During this time the application freezes until the action is completed. It often takes a few seconds to render a new element, paste an object, etc. The application responds well to user requests and features minimal lag and wait time when an operation is initiated. Working with objects can get confusing because of over-reliance on the Properties panel. Good interface, all buttons have text captions to make the functionality clear. Captivate Round 2: User Experience Feature

Will I design slides in Photoshop prior to creating the learning course? If so, how important is it to be able to import designs directly into the authoring tools?.

If I expect the learners to use mobile devices for learning, will they do this often enough to justify the longer time needed to create responsive learning projects?.

Will my learners access eLearning from mobile devices as well as desktops?.

If I need virtual reality compatibility, will I be satisfied with a limited set of VR features?.

Do I plan to create virtual reality-based training programs, are my learners and organization ready for this type of content?.

Will I need to import PowerPoint content into my eLearning course?.

Here are some questions that can help you decide which tool will better meet your needs:

ADOBE CAPTIVATE VS ARTICULATE 360 SOFTWARE

Both authoring tools work equally well with Cluelabs widgets and software simulations and generally support modern eLearning trends. And Adobe Captivate scores higher with virtual reality, responsive content, and Adobe Photoshop import. So far, Articulate Storyline is only a winner when it comes to importing PowerPoint content. Summary: Supported Content (Storyline-10 points, Captivate-15 points) Furthermore, the edits you make later in Photoshop can propagate directly to Captivate, saving you time and effort. Upon import, they are laid out on the screen as they were positioned in the Photoshop file, saving time on content positioning and alignment. The assets can be imported from Photoshop. There are currently no options to import assets directly from Adobe Photoshop. In addition, you cannot interact with PowerPoint objects through Advanced Actions in Captivate. This means that content cannot be edited directly in Captivate, any edits have to go through PowerPoint, which adds extra steps to the process and makes the development process less convenient.

While PowerPoint slides can be imported into a Captivate project, it’s worth noting that slides are imported as single objects. Slide content is converted into Storyline objects (text boxes, shapes, etc.), becomes part of the slide, and can be moved around and edited in Storyline. Prior to importing, Storyline will display a two-dimensional grid showing all slides in the presentation to help the user select only those slides that are needed. Users have the ability to import slides from a PowerPoint presentation. Software simulations are supported in Captivate equally well. Storyline provides a set of tools to record, edit, and display software simulations. Responsive eLearning projects are supported and work well with different types of devices, content can adjust based on the screen size. While the player itself is responsive and adjusts based on the screen size, the eLearning content, however, always looks the same no matter the device. The presets and publishing settings will allow you to set the output quality.

ADOBE CAPTIVATE VS ARTICULATE 360 MP4

You have the ability to publish the eLearning project as a video in the MP4 format.

Storyline will allow you to select dimensions, video and audio quality, and other options. Virtual reality is not currently supported in Articulate Storyline.Īdobe Captivate 2019 allows creating basic virtual reality eLearning projects. Captivate Round 1: Supported Content Feature Scroll down to start comparing the two authoring tools or click the link to jump to the section of your interest: We hope that the information provided here will highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each tool, and will enable our readers to make an informed decision when selecting the eLearning authoring software for custom eLearning development. In this guide, we are comparing Articulate Storyline 360 and Adobe Captivate 2019. Here, at eLearning Company, we have been asked the question “Storyline or Captivate, which one should I go with?” more times than we can count, so we decided to do a thorough review of both tools to help our readers select the eLearning authoring tool that is right for them. Captivate: Features Compared Side-by-Side

Adobe captivate vs articulate 360